HypTide: Personalized Self-Hypnosis
Wellness for your Soul. Discover the power of personalized self-hypnosis with HypTide.
Unlock the Power of Self-Hypnosis
HypTide is a next-generation hypnosis assistant that tailors sessions to each user’s needs. Unlike generic meditation or pre-recorded hypnosis apps, HypTide dynamically creates unique hypnosis scripts based on user goals. Whether someone wants to reduce stress, improve sleep, boost confidence, or break a habit, HypTide adapts in real time—providing a deeply personal and immersive experience.
What makes HypTide unique
Fully Personalized – Tailored to your needs
Individual Scripts – Every session is unique
Library – Reuse your most powerful scripts
How HypTide Works
You start by sharing your goals and challenges with HypTide.
HypTide’s AI analyzes your input and creates a unique hypnosis script tailored to your needs.
HypTide guides you through your personalized hypnosis session using audio and visual cues.
Why HypTide?
Dual Input Modes
Input the topic you want to tackle. Provide further context to personalize your experience.
Flexibility
Every session is dynamically generated based on your needs.
Focus
More than meditation—designed for deep mental shifts and behavioral transformation.
Insights
Track your well-being over time with progress monitoring.
The Science backing Hypnosis
Myth: Hypnosis is a form of mind control where the hypnotist can make you do things against your will.
Fact: Hypnosis is actually a state of focused attention and heightened suggestibility where you remain in control. Research shows participants can and do reject suggestions that conflict with their values or desires.
Myth: Only weak-minded or gullible people can be hypnotized.
Fact: Studies indicate hypnotizability is related to cognitive traits like absorption and imaginative capacity rather than gullibility. About 75% of people can be hypnotized to some degree, with varying levels of susceptibility.
Myth: Hypnosis is just placebo effect with no real physiological changes.
Fact: Neuroimaging studies have documented measurable changes in brain activity during hypnosis, particularly in areas related to attention, pain perception, and executive control.
Myth: There’s no scientific evidence supporting hypnosis as a therapeutic technique.
Fact: Multiple meta-analyses and controlled clinical trials have demonstrated hypnotherapy’s effectiveness for conditions including chronic pain, IBS, anxiety, and smoking cessation, with effect sizes comparable to other established treatments.
Recent research papers on the effectiveness of hypnosis
Adjunctive use of hypnosis for clinical pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
A 2024 systematic review of 70 RCTs (n = 6,078) shows that adding hypnosis to usual care, education, psychological or pharmacological treatments yields small‑to‑medium extra reductions in pain intensity (≈ 2 – 13 points on a 0‑100 scale) across chronic and procedural pain, but the very low certainty of evidence means these adjunctive analgesic benefits—especially the promising effect when paired with education for chronic pain—remain uncertain and need mechanistic clarification.
Hypnosis intervention for sleep disturbances in individuals with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized pilot study.
In a two‑arm pilot RCT of 21 adults with mild cognitive impairment, a five‑week self‑administered hypnosis audio program was feasible, safe and acceptably adhered to, and—compared with sham hypnosis—yielded significant, actigraphy‑supported improvements in sleep duration, subjective sleep quality and daytime sleepiness, indicating that non‑pharmacological hypnosis may offer a promising alternative to medications for poor sleep in MCI pending larger trials.
Cardiac coherence and medical hypnosis: a feasibility study for managing pre‑operative anxiety in cancer surgery
In a prospective feasibility study of 53 women awaiting breast or gynaecological cancer surgery, a seven‑day home programme that paired cardiac‑coherence breathing with medical‑hypnosis audio was practical—64 % completed ≥ 14 sessions—highly acceptable (median satisfaction 10/10; 94 % eager to continue) and, in participants with severe baseline anxiety, significantly reduced pre‑operative VAS and APAIS scores, justifying a forthcoming randomised efficacy trial.
Who benefits the most from different psychological chronic‑pain treatments?
In secondary analyses of a four‑arm RCT with 173 adults suffering chronic or neuropathic pain, pre‑treatment hypnotizability and specific EEG oscillation profiles—but not catastrophizing—significantly moderated changes in pain intensity, interference and depression across four‑session cognitive therapy, pain‑focused hypnosis, cognition‑focused hypnosis and education control, suggesting these neuro‑cognitive markers could enable personalised matching to the most effective psychological pain intervention if future studies replicate the findings.